Skip to main content
SPACEEEMARS BEES MISSION · BIG ASS MARS LEGACY
BATCH 01LIMITEDMISSIONOPENRESERVE
WHO · HOW · WHY

Wonder earns attention. Accuracy earns trust.

The public rules governing SPACEBEE Journal articles, scientific claims, AI assistance, reviews and corrections.

Who publishes the Journal?

The SPACEBEE Research Desk is the mission’s editorial identity. It is not a scientific institution and does not imply anonymous expert endorsement. Named reviewers will appear only after a qualified person has formally reviewed a specific article.

How articles are created

Each article begins with a real audience question. The Research Desk reviews accessible primary or authoritative sources, identifies the strongest argument and counterargument, and labels the conclusion as established evidence, interpretation, hypothesis or mission ambition.

AI assistance may be used for outlining, language editing and exploring counterarguments. A human reviews the claims, citations and evidence status box before publication. AI output is never treated as a scientific source.

Why we publish provocative headlines

SPACEBEE uses controversy to invite serious investigation, not to disguise fiction as evidence. Every difficult headline must be followed by an immediate evidence label and a fair counterargument.

Corrections policy

Substantive corrections will be dated and explained on the affected page. Changes to style do not receive a correction note. Readers and researchers may send documented correction requests through the official contact channel listed by SPACEBEE; unsupported demands for promotional or political changes will not alter the evidence record.

Scientific review status

Independent scientific reviewer positions remain open. Until a named qualified reviewer is displayed, readers should understand that articles are mission explainers, not research papers reviewed by independent peers.